Why is Oakland the most resistant city to do anything about encampments?

Under Mayor Lurie San Francisco has taken unprecedented steps to clear out encampments, arrest drug dealers, remove abandoned vehicles from the streets, and stop sideshows. Berkeley is following suit, toughening its anti-encampment policies significantly last year, although some of its new ordinances continue to be—as usual—challenged in court by pro-encampment radicals. In Fremont, as we’ve seen, the same regressive forces that have stalled encampment cleanups in other cities have been unusually aggressive. As I blogged the other day, they’ve managed to coerce Fremont into partially undoing its recently-approved encampment ban, and are actively working to scuttle the remnants of the ordinance.

Who won the fight in Fremont over encampment bans?

Pro-homeless advocates claim they won because they forced the city to rescind the part of its new law that would criminally charge anyone caught “aiding and abetting” homeless people. Anti-encampment activists say they won because the rest of Fremont’s law outlawing encampments remains in effect. The City Council passed the law in February. Its two main components are: